GENERALITY LABS
What it was engaged to test, on what terms, what it found in the document's own words, and what happened afterwards. Every line is a record; every record links to the document it was read from.
- FoundedJuly 2026
- HQLondon
- Registry idnone cited
- TestsLondon AI safety R&D lab that maintains Inspect Evals and audits other evaluators' benchmarks; co-founder and CEO Justin Olive; spun out of Arcadia Impact in July 2026
- Money, as the roster puts itnot stated
- Filesdossier · observatory, sliced to it · graph
- Labs tested
- no lab document names it
- Models
- no model named
- Span of engagements
- none dated
- Terms and findings
- 0 of 0 documents state a term · 0 quote a finding
- Money in, US dollars, stated single-recipient rows
- $5,400,000 3 in · 0 outfrom Coefficient Giving · Marius Hobbhahn · UK AI Security Institute
- Seats, by side
- funder 1 between 1 2 people: Alexandra Abbas, Marius Hobbhahn
- Afterwards
- no later event on record
Each count is the number of store records that name this evaluator. An engagement is one lab document naming it for one model; an outcome is an event on the record afterwards; the money, seats and moves are the observatory's rows filtered to it. A cell that cannot be filled says not stated, and each table ends with how many of its rows state each field.
Filters combine: any of the values ticked within a dimension, all of the dimensions at once. A table that has no column for a dimension you have set says so instead of showing rows that cannot match. The address bar carries the slice.
What it was engaged to test 0 engagements
In date order, each from the lab document that names the evaluator. Under each: the four terms that document states (access, model stage, publication, payment) and the finding in its words. A term the document is silent on reads not stated; the tags beside the terms are read off their words and are what the console filters on.
No lab document on record names this evaluator for a model.
Dated 0 of 0Model named 0 of 0Terms stated 0 of 0Finding quoted 0 of 0
The terms, as the documents state them
The same engagements as a grid, one row per document and model, so the silences line up: a document that gives an access window but no payment term, or a finding but no publication term, reads that way here.
| Document | Model | Access window | Model stage | Publication | Payment | Finding | Record |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no engagement on record | |||||||
Access window 0 of 0Model stage 0 of 0Publication 0 of 0Payment 0 of 0Finding, quoted 0 of 0
What happened afterwards 0 on record
Events a party published after an engagement: an incident on a model this evaluator's engagement covered, a correction or added disclosure, a later finding that cut against an earlier one, a lab's statement that it acted or did not act on the finding, or a move from this evaluator to a lab it graded. A row the source attaches to this evaluator by name is marked named; one that reaches it through the model it tested is marked via the model. The kind is what the record states, not why.
| Kind | Developer | Model | What the record states | When | Source | Id |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no later event on record | ||||||
Dated 0 of 0Model named 0 of 0Tied to an engagement 0 of 0Evaluator named by the record 0 of 0
The money on record 3 rows · $5,400,000 in, stated single-recipient rows
Rows of the observatory's money table that name this evaluator as recipient (in) or as funder (out), each as the record states it: a grant table line, a contract notice, a Form 990 schedule or the party's own disclosure. A figure quoted in prose is marked and never summed.
| Direction | Funder | Recipient | Amount, as recorded | When | Record | Source | Id |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| in | Coefficient Giving | GENERALITY LABS | $4,400,000" $4.4M in seed funding from Coefficient Giving" (2026) | 2026 | party's own page | Generality Labs | 91897decbe |
| in | UK AI Security Institute | GENERALITY LABS | $1,000,000stated (approximate)the Inspect Evals project "has been contracted with the UK AISI since January '25" and counted more than $1M in contracts with the Institute, Epoch and METR before its spin-offthe Inspect Evals project "has been contracted with the UK AISI since January '25" and counted more than | not dated | party's own page | METR; Epoch AI; Manifund; Generality Labs | bf946cf3f4 |
| in | Marius Hobbhahn | GENERALITY LABS | no amount publishedSupported the 2025 bridge round | 2025 | grant database | Manifund | 06645e272e |
Amount stated 2 of 3Dated 2 of 3Purpose stated 1 of 3Funder profiled 3 of 3Recipient on the roster 3 of 3
Seats and moves 2 seats · 0 moves
Seats read off a team page, a governance page, an appointment notice or a filing that name this organization, and the dated moves into or out of it, from the observatory's own tables.
| Person | Side | Seat, as the record states it | Role | Dates | Source | Id |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marius Hobbhahnslice | funder | Manifund regrantor who supported the 2025 bridge round of the Inspect Evals project now held by Generality Labs | Manifund regrantor who supported the bridge round | 2025 – current, as read | Manifund | 9ac079fd08 |
| Alexandra Abbasslice | between | Technical Program Manager, Meridian Labs; "co-founded the AI Safety Engineering Taskforce in 2024," the Arcadia Impact programme from which Generality Labs spun outnames this evaluator alongside its own organization | Technical Program Manager | dates not stated | Meridian Labs; Manifund | e6becd0a0d |
Role read 2 of 2Organization read 2 of 2Organization profiled 2 of 2Dated 1 of 2
Moves
| Person | From | To | When | Source | Id | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| no move on record names this evaluator | ||||||
From profiled 0 of 0To profiled 0 of 0Person profiled 0 of 0Dated 0 of 0