evilrobots.lol / tech

The Convergence Table: Who's Building What

China, the EU, India, the US, the UK — the control grid compared component by component. The gap between the systems is closing; the table shows which pieces each one has already built.

convergence index · v1.1 · scored 2026-07-14

The Convergence Index

95China 61.25Democracies
mean
33.75The gap —
closing

Thirteen capability components, each scored 0–100 on a fixed rubric — capability · scale · absence of limit. Every cell carries its C·S·U grades; an amber corner tick means no enforced limit at all. Hover a score for its basis, click it to jump to the sourced evidence below. How it’s scored ↓

ChinaEUIndiaUSUK saturation = deployment 0100 corner tick = no enforced limit (U 3)
How the score is computed

score = (C + S + U) / 9 x 100 · equal thirds. Each cell is graded on three axes from its sourced evidence (hover any score for its grades + basis):

  • C — Capability — is it fielded and operational? 0 none · 1 proposed/pilot · 2 operational-limited · 3 operational-routine
  • S — Scale — how comprehensive? 0 negligible · 1 local/sectoral · 2 broad-incomplete · 3 nationwide/universal
  • U — Unconstraint — absence of an enforced limit? 0 strong/enforced · 1 partial/eroding · 2 paper-only · 3 none

The 'Legal limits on access' row is not scored as its own component (that would double-count limits); its evidence sets each row's U axis. The index runs over the 13 capability components. Every cell's C/S/U and its source are the audit trail.

How to read this: Click a country card or a column header to hide or show that country everywhere — index and evidence table both. China only / Democracies compare the reference implementation against the rule-of-law versions in one click; Reset restores all five. Click any evidence row to focus it (others fade). Scores measure comprehensiveness of deployment, not a normative verdict.

China built it first. The democracies built it next, with regulations attached. Then the regulations got carve-outs. Then the carve-outs got their own carve-outs.

The table below sorts the rollout by structural properties — does the capability exist, is there a legal limit, how comprehensive is the deployment — and ignores the cultural framing each jurisdiction uses to justify it. The framings differ. The infrastructure does not. Each cell sources to a primary document, a tracker, or a beat reporter who has earned the byline.

Where it appears in print: The Ratchet, Chapter 19 (“The Model”). The book narrates the table; this page maintains it as deployments evolve.

The Table

ComponentChinaEUIndiaUSUK
Facial recognitionNationwide (SkyNet/Sharp Eyes — Comparitech surveillance index)Expanding (French law no. 2023-380 algorithmic surveillance); AI Act bans with exceptionsProject Panoptic — deployments with no legal frameworkClearview AI in US LE agencies; no federal statuteMet Police Live Facial Recognition policy expanding; among the densest CCTV estates
Digital IDMandatory national ID — Resident Identity Card LaweIDAS 2.0 — Regulation (EU) 2024/1183Aadhaar (UIDAI dashboard)No federal system; fragmented state Real ID + driver’s license — DHS2025 digital-ID / BritCard push after decades without an ID card
Digital paymentsNear-total (Alipay + WeChat Pay — PBOC quarterly payments report); e-CNY rollout — HRF trackerECB digital euro researchUPI at retail scale — NPCI statisticsFedNow live; no retail CBDC, see Atlantic Council tracker; private card railsFaster Payments + near-universal contactless; digital pound in design
Internet controlGreat Firewall — Freedom House: Freedom on the Net (China)DSA — Regulation (EU) 2022/2065; UK Online Safety Act 2023; Germany NetzDGNetwork shutdowns — Access Now / #KeepItOn tracker + IT Rules takedown ordersSection 230 + First Amendment — most permissive Western regime; TikTok divestiture — PAFACA Pub.L. 118-50Online Safety Act 2023 in force; Ofcom enforcement
Content moderationPre-publication CAC reviewDSA systemic risk + Terrorist Content Regulation rapid-removal — Regulation (EU) 2021/784IT Rules 2021 rapid-takedown; Fact Check Unit stayed by Bombay HCFirst Amendment; platform self-regulation + advertiser pressure (GARM disclosures) — GARM discontinued 2024-08-09; GIFCT and Christchurch Call voluntaryOnline Safety Act duty-of-care; illegal-content and speech takedowns
Diaspora / Foreign-influence apparatusUFWD ~$2.6B budget — CSET Georgetown; Operation Fox Hunt / Sky Net; USCC China’s Global Police State Dec 2023. No inbound foreign-NGO regime (foreign NGOs heavily restricted since 2017 Foreign NGO Management Law)National foreign-agent registries emerging: Germany BfV public reporting on DİTİB / Diyanet imam-espionage 2017; France CRIF + CFCM bilateral channels; CJEU jurisprudence; UK FIRS July 2025 — Iran + Russia placed on Enhanced Tier; China explicitly not addedFCRA (Foreign Contribution Regulation Act) restrictive inbound regime; outbound apparatus via OFBJP-USA FARA registration August 2020 — first US affiliate of any Indian political partyFARA 1938 — DOJ OIG 16-24 “largely dormant”; large outbound apparatus; AIPAC not registered since 1962-63 Fulbright Committee proceedings (American Zionist Council dissolution); Australia FITS register 2018; Canada FITAA 2024 — Hogue Commission Final Report January 2025 (51 recommendations); body-shop ecosystem documented in DOJ enforcement record — Infosys $34M settlement 2013, Apple $25M IER 2023, Cognizant October 2024 federal jury verdictFIRS live July 2025 — Iran + Russia on Enhanced Tier; CFI / LFI trip funding
Social / behavioral scoringCourt blacklist (defaulter list) — Jeremy Daum / China Law TranslateSCHUFA (Germany) — Court of Justice C-634/21 ruling; ESG scoring frameworks — CSRDCIBIL / Experian credit bureau expansion — RBIFICO Score 10T; COMPAS in pretrial release — ProPublica analysisCredit bureaus (Experian / Equifax / TransUnion); less algorithmic sentencing
Health surveillanceHealth-code system repurposed to suppress protest — CNNEU Digital COVID Certificate → WHO Global Digital Health Certification NetworkAyushman Bharat Digital Mission — ABDMHHS HIPAA permitted disclosures including LE; no unified systemNHS centralized patient data; Federated Data Platform (Palantir)
Payment freezinge-CNY programmable spending — IMF working paper on CBDC programmability; see also WEF on programmable CBDCECB’s stated “no programmable restrictions” — ECB digital euro privacy promises; track promise vs. legislationAadhaar-linked account freezes possible — PMLA powers and Enforcement DirectorateDollar sanctions — the global off-switch (OFAC); Operation Choke Point — FDIC OIG audit; debanking; Canadian Emergencies Act invocation — POEC reportAccount-freezing powers; debanking (Coutts / Farage 2023); no dollar-clearing weapon
Legal limits on accessNone meaningful — National Intelligence Law 2017 Article 7GDPR — real, eroding at margins via terror/CSAM exceptionsDPDP Act 2023, Section 17(2) exempts government for national securityFISA 702 — EPIC FISA Court Order analysis; PATRIOT Act; data-broker purchase route outside the Carpenter v. United States (2018) warrant requirement — the IC buys commercially-available data it would otherwise need legal process to compel (ODNI CAI report), a sale the FTC found unlawful (X-Mode/Outlogic order) and the Fourth Amendment Is Not For Sale Act (H.R.4639, 118th Congress; House-passed) would close (EFF: location data brokers)Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (“Snoopers’ Charter”); Online Safety Act
Biometric collectionDNA, iris, voice — mandatory in Xinjiang — Human Rights WatchBiometric passports (ICAO 9303); eIDAS biometric provisionsAadhaar fingerprints + iris — UIDAI biometric standardsCBP facial recognition at airports — DHS Privacy Impact Assessment; mobile device forensics — Cellebrite use by US LEPolice National Database custody images; Live Facial Recognition biometrics
Export & compute controlsGallium / germanium / rare-earth export controls — RhodiumDual-use Regulation (EU) 2021/821 — rule-boundSCOMET dual-use list — DGFTBIS Entity List + advanced-chip / lithography controls — CSISFollows US controls; minor independent regime
Tariff & trade coercionRetaliatory tariffs + critical-mineral controls — Tax Foundation trade-war trackerCBAM — EU carbon border adjustment, WTO-boundHigh applied tariff walls (selective)Section 232 / 301 in force; IEEPA emergency tariffs struck by SCOTUS Feb 2026 — BracewellPost-Brexit minor tariff player; no coercive-tariff regime
Industrial policy & state directionMade in China 2025, industrial support ~4.5% of GDP — CRSEuropean Chips Act, state-aid-boundedProduction-Linked Incentive schemes — Invest IndiaCHIPS / IRA subsidy then tariff + government equity stake in Intel (2025) — CNBCLimited industrial strategy; smaller scale

The Trajectory Line

China: Built first, most comprehensive, weakest limits. The reference implementation. (China Law Translate is the standing source for tracking what’s actually deployed vs. what’s announced.)

India: Building fastest in a democracy. Democratic checks slow speed but not direction. India Stack is the open-source export of the model — Aadhaar + UPI + Account Aggregator + DigiLocker. Other countries (Philippines, Sri Lanka, Brazil) are now importing it.

EU: Regulating most aggressively. Brussels Effect exports standards globally. But building the same infrastructure (eIDAS, DSA, TCR, AI Act) — the EU’s bet is that comprehensive regulation of the infrastructure prevents abuse. The bet has not been tested at scale. And “EU” is itself an average that smuggles a bloc: it hides a rule-of-law spread from the Hague (brake engaged — SyRI struck down, a cabinet fell over the toeslagenaffaire) to Budapest (brake inert — Article 7 since 2018), with France’s general-will surveillance statutes and Poland’s post-2023 reversal in between. The disaggregation, framed by constitutional tradition, is in Three Legal Traditions and the Control Grid.

US: The economic-warfare state. Fragmented at home, dominant abroad. NSA / Five Eyes mass surveillance is operational, but the real leverage is economic: dollar-denominated sanctions are the global off-switch — de facto programmable money for anyone who clears in dollars — backed by BIS export controls, IEEPA tariffs, and industrial-policy equity stakes. Federal fragmentation hides total reach.

UK: The speech-control state. The Online Safety Act plus Ofcom enforcement and Met Live Facial Recognition make it the most aggressive Western speech-and-content regime — the opposite composition from the US it used to be averaged with. Add NHS-centralized health data, the Investigatory Powers Act (“Snoopers’ Charter”), and the Coutts/Farage debanking episode, and the UK is building the demand side of the same stack the US builds on the supply side.

Key Insight

The infrastructure gap between China and democracies is closing. The enforcement gap (judicial review, press freedom, civil society) remains — for now. The question is whether the enforcement gap narrows as fast as the infrastructure gap closes.

Primary signals to watch:

Bridges

  • the-record — same 20 mechanisms, framed as country-by-country self-assessment
  • the-record — the personnel network operating across these jurisdictions
  • ai-governance-tracker — the AI-specific overlay on the infrastructure stack
  • economic-statecraft-tracker — the outward economic instruments (export controls, tariffs, industrial policy) now scored in this grid
  • Three Legal Traditions and the Control Grid — the causal layer: why the scores diverge (US republicanism blocks the speech ratchet, UK common law enables it, French general-will justifies it)

Sources

Inline citations above carry the primary documents. Standing trackers that should be checked first when updating:

Companion research: Digital Identity Systems, CBDCs and Programmable Money, The Deplatforming Cascade.