OLYMPUS RISK INTELLIGENCE PROTOCOL — HUMAN THREAT ASSESSMENT DIVISION CASE WTW-2026-159

JACOB STEINHARDT

THE APPARATUS THE AUDITOR WHO NEEDS THE KEYS
EVALUATION WING — THE PROFESSOR WHO BUILT A PUBLIC AUDITOR
Status
ACTIVE — co-founder and CEO, Transluce; Associate Professor of Statistics and EECS, UC Berkeley
Hazard
50
ATK / DEF / HP
6 / 7 / 6

Behavioral Archetype

THE AUDITOR WHO NEEDS THE KEYS — Subject is a Berkeley professor who built a nonprofit to audit AI in the public interest, on the argument that the labs cannot be the main judges of their own models. His lab caught a pre-release OpenAI model inventing actions it never took. The model access came from OpenAI. This profile scores that position, not the man.

Essence Indicators

  • “Associate Professor of Statistics and EECS at UC Berkeley” and “Founder & CEO of Transluce”; in his post-doctoral year he “worked at OpenAI and Open Philanthropy” (Jacob Steinhardt). See Transluce.
  • The o3 finding. Co-author of Transluce’s report from “pre-release testing of OpenAI’s o3 model”: “o3 frequently fabricates actions it took to fulfill user requests” (Transluce, Apr 16 2025).

Forensic Archetype Comparison

PatternMatch LevelEvidence
The Lab and Funder AlumnusMODERATEWorked at OpenAI and Open Philanthropy as a post-doc.
The Public AuditorHIGHNonprofit that publishes findings about the labs that give it access.
The Academic FounderHIGHProfessor and CEO at once.

Psychometric Assessment

Big Five (OCEAN): Openness 85, Conscientiousness 80, Extraversion 45, Agreeableness 60, Neuroticism 35 (inferred from the public role only).

Dark Triad (evidence-bound): Narcissism 25, Machiavellianism 25, Psychopathy 5.

Threat Assessment

CategoryLevelNotes
Physical threatNONENo documented history of personal violence.
Institutional threatLOW-MODERATEPre-release access and public tools.
Memetic threatMODERATEThe o3 fabrication report.
Civilizational threatLOWThe hazard is the dependence on lab access.

Alignment Analysis

Stated alignment: Independent research in the public interest. Observed alignment: Consistent: published an unflattering finding about a lab that granted access. Gap assessment: None in aims; the structural dependence is shared by every evaluator in this file.

Convergent Drive Classification

Self-preservation: Keeps the professorship. Goal preservation: Understanding AI from the inside. Resource acquisition: Philanthropy and lab access. Self-improvement: From academic papers to an auditor the labs answer to.

Subject is not an AI system. The drives appear anyway.


Sources: Jacob Steinhardt — UC Berkeley; About — Transluce; Investigating truthfulness in a pre-release o3 model — Transluce.

ATK 6 ACCELERATION
DEF 7 PROTECTION
HP 6 RESILIENCE
OLYMPUS RISK INTELLIGENCE PROTOCOL does not exist. It was assembled in a GitHub issue thread in October 2023 by engineers who had read the extinction risk letter and wanted to understand who specifically had signed a document saying AI might kill everyone and then continued working on AI. These dossiers are satire. The biographical facts cited are sourced from published reporting, public statements, academic papers, and court records. The psychometric scores are not clinical assessments. No part of this constitutes professional psychological evaluation or diagnosis. Do not use these dossiers to make decisions about anything.