DAVID SACKS
- Status
- ACTIVE — White House Special Advisor for AI and Crypto (special government employee); co-founder, Craft Ventures
- Hazard
- 74
- ATK / DEF / HP
- 8 / 7 / 8
Behavioral Archetype
THE INVESTOR WHO WRITES THE RULES — Subject is the White House’s adviser on AI and crypto while remaining invested, through Craft Ventures, in the industries he advises on, under the ethics rules for a special government employee. He has publicly accused Anthropic of regulatory capture. This profile scores that position, not the man.
Essence Indicators
- The role. The January 2025 executive order on AI tasks “the Special Advisor for AI and Crypto” with drafting the AI Action Plan (White House, Jan 2025).
- The investments. Senator Elizabeth Warren and colleagues wrote to him that “Through Craft Ventures and your other holdings, you are deeply invested in the crypto and AI companies that you have the power to impact,” and that “The White House waived ethics restrictions to allow you to maintain those investments,” asking how many days he had served against the 130-day limit for special government employees (Senator Warren, Sept 2025).
- On Anthropic. “Anthropic is running a sophisticated regulatory capture strategy based on fear-mongering. It is principally responsible for the state regulatory frenzy that is damaging the startup ecosystem” (his post, Oct 14, 2025). See Anthropic.
Forensic Archetype Comparison
| Pattern | Match Level | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| The Revolving Door | HIGH | Venture investor serving as the White House’s AI adviser. |
| The Special Government Employee | HIGH | Ethics waivers and the 130-day limit, per Senator Warren’s letter. |
| The Partisan of Speed | HIGH | Public attacks on Anthropic’s regulatory positions. |
Psychometric Assessment
Big Five (OCEAN): Openness 70, Conscientiousness 70, Extraversion 75, Agreeableness 30, Neuroticism 35 (inferred from the public role only).
Dark Triad (evidence-bound; measures the role, not character): Narcissism 55, Machiavellianism 60, Psychopathy 15.
Threat Assessment
| Category | Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Physical threat | NONE | No documented history of personal violence. |
| Institutional threat | HIGH | Shapes federal AI policy while invested in AI companies. |
| Memetic threat | HIGH | Podcast host and prolific poster. |
| Civilizational threat | MODERATE | Sets the federal posture against state AI rules. |
Alignment Analysis
Stated alignment: Light-touch rules to win the AI race. Observed alignment: Consistent. Gap assessment: The structural question is the one Senator Warren asked: whether a part-time adviser can regulate industries he is invested in.
Convergent Drive Classification
Self-preservation: Kept the investments under a waiver. Goal preservation: Startup-friendly, light-touch regulation. Resource acquisition: Craft Ventures. Self-improvement: From investor to the White House’s AI voice.
Subject is not an AI system. The drives appear anyway.
Sources: Removing Barriers to American Leadership in AI — White House (Jan 2025); Letter to David Sacks — Sen. Warren (Sept 2025); his post, Oct 14, 2025.
Get updates on the Evil Robots series
Newsletter essays on AI escape, deception, and the humans who built them.